:PRESCRIBED-NOTICE-CONSTRUCTIVE.

The Coat of arms of the Diocese of St David’s, Archbishop of all Britannia, ecclesiastic patent consists of shield and mitre only. Patron Saint of Wales – Esgobaeth Tyddewi. (Circa 6th Cent. A.D.) ‘ARCHBISHOP.—Let us on. And publish the occasion of our arms. The commonwealth is sick of their own choice.’— Shakespeare, “King Henry IV.” (Part II.), Act I. Sc. III.; International Committee for the Red Cross (I.C.R.C.), Customary [Hu]man-itarian International Law (C.H.I.L.), ~Law of Armed Conflict with the Enemies Foreign and Domestic Administration under Usufruct (L.O.A.C.), Rule 27. Religious Personnel ~Summary.

Authorities: Australian Treaty 1910 No. 8, International Convention concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague Convention (IV)), Art. 55. “The occupying State shall be regarded only as administrator and usufructuary of public buildings, real estate, forests, and agricultural estates belonging to the hostile State, and situated in the occupied country. It must safeguard the capital of these properties, and administer them in accordance with the rules of usufruct.” Art. 56. “The property of local authorities, as well as that of institutions dedicated to public worship, charity, education, and to science and art, even when State property, shall be treated as private property. Any seizure or destruction of, or wilful damage to, institutions of this character, historic monuments and works of science and art, is forbidden, and should be made the subject of legal proceedings.”

Authority: Customary International Law of Armed Conflict, Rule 51. Public and Private Property in Occupied Territory; This premise is also evident through the words of Thomas Jefferson in a letter to James Madison Sept 6, 1789 where in he writes, “I set out on this ground which I suppose to be self evident, “that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living;” that the (civilly) dead have neither powers nor rights over it. The portion occupied by an individual ceases to be his when himself ceases to be, and reverts to the society.” This rule is contained in several military manuals.

The Australian Defence Doctrine Publications (ADDP) ‘ADDP 06.4 – Law of Armed Conflict, par. 12.48 states: “Private property may not be confiscated. Enemy public immovable property may be administered and used but it may not be confiscated.” Gen. 1:28.

General Orders No. 100: The Instructions for the Government of Armies (Lieber Code): FM 27-10.

:For the good-faith and man-kind are with the claim of the envoy-astronaut-vessel for the state of the life with the registry-claim of the live-life on the dry-dock of the planet in a sea of the space by the math: For this subject matter is with legal-alien-claimant’s right for the salvage/claim owner in due course with the knowledge of the I AM. ~United Nations Outer Space Treaty (1967), Art. ~V, ~VIII; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Treaty (U.N.C.L.O.S.), Part VII, High Seas, Art. ~91~Nationality of ships: Art. ~101~Definition of Piracy.

:For this claim by the ‘legal usufruct established by operation of law for the right of a surviving spouse to property owned by the deceased spouse.’ [La. Civ. Code art. 890; Executors and Administrators 176; Husband and Wife 273; Wills 11: Cf. ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT 1901 (Cwth) – SECT 2CA References to spouses; Construction of Acts to be subject to Constitution – SECT 15A]; “The curtesy (life-rent given by law) is due to the (surviving) husband (of all his wife’s heritage of which she died infeft) is due to the husband rather as father to the heir, conformable to the Roman law, which gives to the father the usufruct of what the child succeeds to by the mother.” [Ersk. Pr. L. Scot. B. 2, t. 9, s. 30. Vide Estate by the curtesy.]; “Guardian by nature is the father, at common law [Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – s.80], and on his death, the mother (vis-a-vis), of a child; and the authority of guardian of the person is derived out of the parent.” [Daniels v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 135 Pa. Super. 450, 5 A.2d 608, 611. See Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed.] “Privity of estate” refers to the legal relationship (partnership) that two parties bear when their estates constitute one (union) estate in law. Tenancy by the entirety definition. “A type of concurrent estate in real property held by a Husband and Wife whereby each owns the undivided whole of the property, coupled with the Right of Survivorship, so that upon the death of one, the survivor (widow) is entitled to the decedent’s share.” West’s Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Maxim of law: Vir et uxor consentur in lege una persona. ‘Husband and wife are considered one person in law.’ Co. Litt. 112. § 203. “Parental Rights.” “It would be anomalous (not conforming to rule) for a Federal law to dissolve or suspend a marriage, and for a State law to decide the destiny of the children of the marriage. At common law a father is entitled to the custody of the child at its mother’s breast, and the court, in making an order as to the custody, pendente lite (pending the litigation), will not, unless some good cause is shown, take away this right.” (Cartledge v . Cartledge, 31 L.J. Mat. 85. Dig. of Eng. Case Law, vol. vii. p. 789.) [Authority: The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, p.611, § 203. “Parental Rights.”] § 204. “Custody and Guardianship of Infants.” “The power of the Parliament to legislate concerning the custody and guardianship of infants is not a general one; it is limited to divorce and matrimonial causes. Apart from that jurisdiction the States retain their former authority in respect to these matters. (Conv. Deb., Adel., 1897, p. 1085.)” [Authority: The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, p.612, § 204. “Custody and Guardianship of Infants.”; Parties – any and all parties must obtain a high court order to override precedent rulings and orders from the High Court of The Commonwealth of Australia. [Authority: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)~ Sect. 25, ‘Powers of court to extend to whole Commonwealth, ‘judgements and ordere… shall have effect… throughout the Commonwealth.’ JUDICIARY ACT 1903 (Cth) – SECT 49, “Contravention of (High Court) order to constitute contempt” and “it is the duty of the (inferior) court (officer/person) not to proceed.”

Cf. Australian Treaty Series 1980 No. 23, Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth), Schedule 2, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 17.1. “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. 2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.” Art. 4.2 Non-derogable and absolute rights, such as Art. 18.4. “The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.” Article 23.1. “The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.”; Cf. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), Art. 1, 9, 10.1, 11, 13.3, inter alia; Article 10(1) “The widest possible protection and assistance should be accorded to the family, which is the natural and fundamental group unit of society.” The Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (Cth) – Schedule 4, Article 27, “Protected persons are entitled, in all circumstances, to respect for their … family rights”. (C.I.H.L. of Armed Conflict, Rule 105. Respect for Family Life; The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict, Australian Defence Doctrine Publication 06.4, 2006, § 9.58, § 12.36. Aged Care Act 1997 (Cth) ~ s.54.11(3)(a) “protected entity”); Australian Treaty 1910 No. 8, International Convention concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague Convention (IV)), Art. 46. “Family honour and rights, individual life, and private property, as well as religious convictions and worship, must be respected. Private property may not be confiscated.” Cf. Australian Treaty Series 1974 No. 2 – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Art. 26 “in good faith”; Art. 62 “Fundamental change of circumstances”; Art. 27 Internal law and observance of treaties ~”A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”

Authorities: The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, p.611, § 203. “Parental Rights.”; p.612, § 204. “Custody and Guardianship of Infants.” [Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ~ Div. 80.3 Defence for acts done in good faith; Div. 83.4 Interference with political rights and duties; Criminal Code Act (Cth) 1995 ~ s.268 – Genocide by forcibly transferring (trafficking, kidnapping, hostage-taking) children, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes against the administration of justice; Deu. 4:7-9; Cf. International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth) (ICC Act) ~ Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Art. 6, 7, 8. Genocide ~ 18 U.S. Code § 1091, Punishment for violations: Death, life imprisonment or fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years; Cf. ICCPR Australian Treaty Series (1980 No. 23), Australian Human Rights Commission Act, 1986 (Cth), Schedule 2, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 17.1. “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. 2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.” Art. 4.2 Non derogable and absolute rights, such as Art. 18.4. “The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.”; CRIMINAL CODE ACT 1995 (Cth) – SCHEDULE, Chap. 5 — The security of the Commonwealth – Div. 80 — Treason, (sedition) urging violence and advocating terrorisim or genocide – Penalty: Imprisonment for life (or capital offence carries the death-penalty, with public execution); Div. 80.2D Advocating genocide ~ Penalty: Imprisonment for 7 years.] inter alia, pursuant to the ‘Book of the Law’, Deu. 31:26, Joshua 1:8; “Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession.” Exodus 21:16 “If someone is caught kidnapping… and treating or selling them as a slave, the kidnapper must die. You must purge the evil from among you.” Deuteronomy 24:7, Psalm 110:5-6; Luke 13:25; “Receive a stranger into your home and he will upset you with commotion, and will estrange you from your family.” Ben Sira 11:29,34; 2 John 1:10; Maxim: A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent – “Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.” Dig. 49, 15, 192; Grot. lib. 3, c. 3, s. 1.

[With the introduction of the Legal Aid 1973, The Law Society 1973, and the Family Law Act 1975, the de facto Australian Government did unlawfully abrogate the right of the family and destroy religious convictions by using (UN) Roman Slave Law to destroy the right of the Father with allegations of the alleged “sins of the fathers” (SURNAME) for the consequences of sin (bonded surety in performance debt) passing through the generations. Cf. Exo. 20:5, Num. 14:18, Deu. 5:9-10, Jer. 32:17-18; Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. The Right of the Father is engrained in Ecclesiastical Law and the Royal Law of the Estates. By Will and Testament, the Right of the Father began with God. Cf. Exo. 20:2, 2 Cor. 6:17.

Gentile philosophers observe the reality of God’s law at work in creation such as these examples of extra-Biblical usage of father’s sins:

• Euripides (c. 485-406 B.C.) Phrixus: “The gods visit the sins of the fathers upon the children.”
• Horace, Odes: “For the sins of your fathers you, though guiltless, must suffer.”
• Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice: “The sins of the father are to be laid upon the children.”

N.B. Principles of International Law Recognized in the (London) Charter of the Nüremberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal, adopted by the International Law Commission, 1950. Nüremberg Principles for International Crimes against peace, War crimes and Crimes against humanity. Cf. Principal VI, VII, inter alia.]

Summation

Should you exceed your statutory authority and move against Us in defiance of this presentment, there is no immunity from prosecution available to you or to any of your fellow public officers, officials of stratocracy government, judges, magistrates, district attorneys, clerks, or any other persons who become involved in the instant actions, or any future actions, against Us by way of aiding and abetting by your unlawful foreign and domestic enemy corporate belligerent entity acts, perfidy, war crimes and grave breaches of the universal jurisdiction Customary International Law of Armed Conflict (L.O.A.C.) Armistice and Sect. 43 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) with no statute of limitations for the ‘institution of proceedings in respect of offence’ under Sect. 13 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). Take due heed and govern yourself accordingly. Any or all unauthorised documents tendered to Us, lacking bona fide wet ink signatures or dates per Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 513-514, are counterfeit security instruments causing you to be liable in your CORPORATE and individual capacity by fraudulent conveyance now and forevermore. If and when you cause any harm, injury and/or damages to the living Man or Woman Secured Party Creditor by violating any of the prerogative inherent rights, privileges, or any terms herein, you agree to voluntarily, with no reservation of rights and defences, at the written request of the living Man or Woman Secured Party, surrender, including but not limited to, any and all bonds, public and/or corporate insurance policies, and CAFR funds as needed to satisfy any and all claims as filed against you by the living Man or Woman Secured Party Principal Creditor. This applies to any and all agents, or representatives, individually and severally, of the “UNITED STATES” or any of the subdivisions, agencies or sub-corporations and/or the corporation [COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, ACN 22 104 616], registered under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as described herein. [Authority: Australian [Hu]man Rights Commission Act, 1986 (Cth), Schedule 2, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), inter alia, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), Article 11, inter alia, and Privacy Act, 1988 (Cth), sch.1, s3.3, inter alia.] “While individuals as a rule have full legal capacity by the operation of law alone, artificial persons are creatures of the state and enjoy civil rights and powers only upon the approval of statutory authorities. The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen (subject). His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [English Common Law right i.e. “Do not encroach against others or their property”] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution.” [Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905); Thomson Newspapers Ltd. v. Canada, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 425; R. v. Hynes, 1999 CanLII 18979 (NL CA), (84); “None shall be put to answer without due process of law; it shall be ‘void in the law’, and holden for error.” [Authority: Due Process of Law Act (ACT) 1368 42 EDW 3 C 3 – SECT 1; Free Access to Courts Act (ACT) 1400 2 HEN 4 C 1 – SECT 4 – Every person shall be in peace; Common Law Procedure Act (NSW) 1899].

All violators, agents, corp-orators, actors under color of law, and actions under color of authority claimed by any corporations, associations, or subcontractors, agencies or agents of any kind or like violating or attempting to violate the rights, political status and Title Order of the Grantee at any time past, present, or future shall be liable severally, and jointly to this notice as an affidavit of obligation in the normal commercial sense and as such is a severity representing accounts receivable and is a lien upon the real and movable property, malpractice insurance and performance bonds of any such violators and is not dischargeable in bankruptcy court or subject to any probate claim; at all times the owner/holder in due courses’ property is exempt from third party levy and all related vessels (2 Tim. 2:21) in commerce and in trade are pre-paid. “Waiver of rights (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) must be voluntary, freely expressed and with clear understanding of true consequences and effects of so doing if it is to be effective; waiver of a fundamental right such as freedom of religion, if possible at all, presumably need not only be voluntary; it must also be explicit, stated in express, specific and clear terms.” Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, 2004 SCC 47, [2004] 2 SCR 551 at [96]; [100].

N.B. by this notice of the point/s set out in this instrument, you shall no longer be able to use plausible deniability with ignorance of the law as a defence [pursuant to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 9. A claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and that this factual truth is expressed in the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ~ Div. 83.4 Interference with political rights and duties; Division 9 – Circumstances involving mistake or ignorance (of fact), 9.5 Claim of right, 9.3 Mistake or ignorance of statute law], ‘(1) A person can be criminally responsible for an offence even if, at the time of the conduct constituting the offence, he or she is mistaken about, or ignorant of, the existence or content of an Act that directly or indirectly creates the offence or directly or indirectly affects the scope or operation of the offence.’ By your now being served with this instrument, you have now been made aware of the terms, conditions and law.

Fee Schedule

Any wrongdoer acting ‘motu proprio’, exceeding statutory authority under colour of law, unverified and/or unsubstantiated barratrous claim of an alleged debt against libellant and/or any variations or interests thereof, and/or any proprietary exclusive right intangible intellectual personal proper-ty asset collateral infringement of common-law in equity copyright of trade-names/word-marks/trade marks/marque/personation in any style/resemblance and derivation or variation thereof and/or attempt to contact or communicate with the libellant by any means shall constitute the agreement of libellees acceptance of all liability and consent to paying libellant the following Fee Schedule in lieu of damages and/or injury, nunc pro tunc is AFFIRMED:

A. Affirm that in the event of failure to state a substantiated claim upon which relief can be granted, personation, arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence, trespass, dishonour, unlawful attacks on reputation, defamation, or nonfeasance, misappropriation or embezzlement of the instrument(s) shall act as cause for a writ of mandate warrant and immediate security agreement lien upon the non-exempt property of the wrongdoer with tacit agreement to be named as tortfeasor outlaw with scienter and Lien Debtor on one or more claims, reports and/or financing statements to be filed and affirm the Secured Party holds a security interest, right of commercial claim, lien and levy against Lien Debtors body, interests, assets, accounts, real estate, all present and after-acquired property – no exceptions, and future earnings as surety under Lien Debtors full commercial and public liability bond/insurance for the sum certain amount of $10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Australian Dollars) plus any interest, charges, penalties, and, extra fees for wrongdoers encroachment, word-mark, trade mark infringement, extortion, threats, dishonour and default in trade, commerce, defamation, fraud, fraud by scienter, commercial injury, violation of commercial law, disavow of the common law in equity and failure to execute a simple contract to provide legal equitable commercial remedy for this matter, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the Secured Party retinue and administrative agencies can initiate a bounty to purge and pursue all lawful measures and actions, administrative, judicial and non-judicial, to investigate Libellees corporate accounting payment order electronic funds transfer irregularities without recourse or any penalty for so doing, commencing without further notice to you as a collection and recoupment on an account of the Secured Party collateral, wherever that may be. If libellees are the owner of any account or ledger stated herein and libellees force the libellant to remain as the holder of any account or ledger stated herein, then libellant shall charge the libellees the sum certain amount of $10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Australian Dollars) per annum as the libellant trustee (subrogee) holders fee. ‘A person infringes a registered trade mark if the person uses as a trade mark a sign that is substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trade mark’ subject to section 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth).

All fees and charges with ‘institution of proceedings in respect of offence’ under Sect. 13 of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) are payable within the Ten (10) days as per the [merchant confirmation rule; U.C.C. § 2-201(2)] invoice terms and conditions from the date invoice is received, as evidenced by the delivery confirmation receipt date.

Failure to notify the registered and protected trade mark (number: 2069445) private personal property representative in writing, within forty-five (45) days of the date shown below, that you shall cease and desist any unauthorised infringing conduct along with compulsory forfeiture and destruction of infringing copies and confirm that you have purged from your files and storage devices all information and/or data regarding or associated with this registered and protected Intellectual Property (IP) exclusive right trade mark and copyright for the BEN ANTHONY RUSHTON®™ and © private personal property, as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling, including but not limited to any and all proprietary estate associated, owned and/or used, style, trade name(s), word mark(s), business name(s), private personal and commercial property, accounts, addresses, phone numbers, biometric data and associated identity numbers, as well as numbers, characters and/or similar symbolic arrangements for the administration of legal estates [cf. 15 U.S. Code § 1118 – Destruction of infringing articles], shall constitute the agreement of you the unauthorised libellees acceptance of all liability and consent to paying the aggrieved party libellant registered Intellectual Property (IP) exclusive right trade mark holder the Fee Schedule specified herein in lieu of damages and/or injury, nunc pro tunc is AFFIRMED and/or initiate legal proceedings for the tort of trespass and/or passing off with misleading or deceptive conduct subject to section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) and others authorities without further notice. Such as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) § 12CA Unconscionable conduct, § 12DA Misleading or deceptive conduct; Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Sect 991A Financial services licensee not to engage in unconscionable conduct; Silence constituting misleading or deceptive conduct within the notion of “refusing to do an act” [cf. Australian Trade Practices Consumer Law in Kaze Constructions Pty Ltd v Housing Indemnity Australia Pty Ltd (1990) FCA, ATPR 51-300, at 22]; The tort of passing off applies where ‘an expression of opinion may constitute misleading or deceptive conduct [under s52 of the Australian Trade Practices Act, Competition and Consumer Act, 2010 (Cth) – Schedule 2 The Australian Consumer Law in Stanton v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (1987) A.T.P.R. 40-755 (i.e. Bankers’ Liability for Financial Advice)]. Conduct will also be misleading if a party fails to attach appropriate qualifications to advice or information that is supplied or fails to disclose that an opinion is based on less than reasonable grounds’ [Cf. Sweetman v Bradfield Management Services Pty Ltd (1994) ATPR 41-290 at 41,910].

Accession by Depositary

For the infant interests were taken at birth; held in an inter vivos trust for safekeeping (evidenced by the certificate of title issued), and being born again in Christ and being the age of majority, I claim this House in His Kingdom and require provisions (or support) for life as well as ‘protected safe-passage’ conduct and ‘innocent passage‘ on His Earth and amongst all nations, acting with care and in ‘safe harbour’ to be honoured as mandated. “The Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia, being the representative in Australia of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, requests all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer (‘natural-born subject‘),… to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford him or her every assistance and protection of which he or she may stand in need”. Source: Safe Passage Request, DFAT Passport; Isaiah 29:13, Matthew 15:8, Mark 7:6.

Addendum and Arbitration Clause

For the affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within the [merchant confirmation rule; U.C.C. § 2-201(2)] Ten (10) day period of original service of notice. Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach, termination or invalidity thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules or the ACICA Expedited Arbitration Rules as at present in force. The arbitration shall be administered by the Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA). The appointing authority shall be ACICA. The number of arbitrators shall be one. The place of arbitration shall be Canberra, Australia. The language to be used in the arbitral proceedings shall be English;

[Authority: International Convention respecting the Limitation of the Employment of Force for the Recovery of Contract Debts [Hague II], Australian Treaty Series 1910 No. 6; Australian Treaty Series 1974 No. 2 – Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Art. 26 “in good faith”; Art. 62 “Fundamental change of circumstances”; Art. 27 Internal law and observance of treaties ~”A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.” International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), Sect. 16].

Only a response that meets the following criteria qualifies as a sufficient verified response showing that:

A. Verification and proof of claim in the form of substantive evidence posted registered mail to the agent ad litem, made true and without deception, fraud or mischief in sworn affidavit form verified and/or affirmed by a signature under the penalty of perjury, or by a signature under your full commercial liability policy details, of the affiant(s) thereof, rebutting each of the undersigned’s points, on a point-by-point basis, against the points raised in the preceding referenced notices; and

B. Any and all timely response(s) to this self-executing binding contract must be directed by verified registered post to the exact Service by and respond to postal exchange location as specified in this notice to verify delivery and appropriate certification, made and received within the [merchant confirmation rule; U.C.C. § 2-201(2)] Ten (10) day period from the date of this estoppel notice; Service in any other manner will be deemed void and defective on its face.

C. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein in the stated fashion and time or successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment, as an operation of law, securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel admission by acquiescence forevermore barring the bringing of charges under any statute, by-law, Code, Act or regulation against the Estate Beneficiaries known as His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :ben-anthony: of the House and Family of the LORD (elohim) [Isaiah 44:5, 2 Ch. 31:21, Psa. 27:4; Eph. 2:19; Jos. 24:14-15] (ge-suis, suae potestate esse) and; for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties. ‘An estoppel arises where party aware of his rights sees other party acting upon mistaken notion of his rights.’ Authority: Minear v. Keith Furnace Co., Iowa, 239 N.W. 584, 587. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th ed; Grundt v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd (1937), HCA 58, 59 CLR 641 at 657, 675-677 (i.e. Estoppel in pais (by conduct without legal proceedings) as a matter of right).

D. A Non-Response within the [merchant confirmation rule; U.C.C. § 2-201(2)] Ten (10) day period from the date of this equitable estoppel notice also expresses non-objection and that the recipients of this Notice of Standing [Romans 14:4] and Claim of Right for the Estate have tacitly agreed upon the claims made herein.

For the ‘proclivity of the adversary not to answer’, so We would not expect the agency to voluntarily offer any information upon the herein referenced understanding of the above unconditional right to remedy. Generally the agency can be expected to play ‘ignorant’, remain ‘silent’ constituting misleading or deceptive conduct and revert to a predictable ‘mail box policy’, and We will answer everything with reservation of all rights [UCC 1-308]. Failure of the agency to answer timely on the part of agency is tacit equitable ‘estoppel.’ As for phone calls they are ‘parol’ and courts will always grant a ‘parol’ opportunity to offer an explanation for ‘dishonouring’ agency presentment(s) by what must be a ‘creditable’ agency phone call.

“Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” [S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54); Job 32:21]

“The Lord Chancellor is the occupant of one of the oldest offices of state, dating back to the Kingdom of England, and older than Parliament itself.”

For the interested parties can respond to the location exactly as follows:

~Chancery Bldg. Registrar-General.

~In care of General Post-Office [Box 5090].

~Poste Restante Collect~10036-81656.

~Chisholm, In Your Capital CITY, Australasia. [Non-Military Post-Code: 2905~9998].

~on the land without AUSTRALIA [28 U.S.C. § 1746 (1)].

Also referred to herein as “document custodian”, “third-party adjudicator” and/or “referee in case of need” as required.

Certification and Verification

We come in peace, One is a living sentient being, de jure solum et naturale, suae potestate esse living soul [Gen. 2:7], known by His Lordship’s (Most Rev. Ex.) appellation :ben-anthony: of the patronymic House and Family of the LORD (elohim) [Isaiah 44:5; Jos. 24:14-15, (suae potestate esse, de jure sanguinis coronae, legalis homo, sui juris), as commonly called and subject only to the will of God (elohim), King of Kings, original supreme Book of Royal Law, demand and exercise One’s right of subrogation with valuable consideration as Special Occupant for the Office of the General Executor, Guardian and Principal Beneficiary for the House of RUSHTON :Ben-Anthony, Estate©™ (ens legis, de facto, crown, persona), hereby under One’s unlimited li(e)-ability, being of sound mind, age of majority, having first-hand knowledge, asseverate, state, and declare that the facts enumerated herein are set forth in good faith with clean hands and to the best of One’s knowledge that the same are true, correct, complete and not misleading, under the Royal Law penalty of perjury, so help Us, God. “Let this mind be in you… also” Philippians 2:5-10.

One, We, Us, Our, Ourselves expressly reserve all One’s unalienable, unassailable and inalienable birthright (dieu-et mon droit) to amend, alter or repeal in parts or its whole this Affidavit at times and places of One’s own choosing, accordingly as new facts and revelations are made available to Us at various future times and places as yet unknown, and as yet to be determined.

Thank you for your consideration, this public notice or delivery confirmation receipt is accepted as acknowledgement of service by you, without dishonour.

Further the Affiant sayeth naught. Executed this Twenty Sixth day of the Eighth month in the year of our Lord, two-thousand and eleven A.D., nunc pro tunc, praeterea preterea, ab initio, on the soil and land at the Office of the Envoy, at the King’s [GvR] seat of Government of the Federal Capital Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia (1909), witness our hands and seals.

Comes now in peace His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :ben-anthony: by the Grace of God, of the patronymic House and Family of the LORD (elohim), private conscience living soul (de jure solum et naturale, suae potestate esse, de jure sanguinis coronae, legalis homo, sui juris), making a special visitation, restricted presence, before the court, in right of the imperial state crown:

By Order of Real Party in Interest (jus in personarum), Paramount Security Interest Holder and Holder in Due Course, not-negotiable, by my will in rerum natura autograph :ben-anthony., L.S.,

All Rights and Dominion Explicitly Reserved, Without Prejudice, Non-Assumpsit, Without Recourse. [Gen. 1:26, U.C.C. § 1-103, 1-301, 3-401(b)(1), 3-402, 1-308; Rule E(8)]

:Constitutional Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia. Est. 8:8.

DIEU ET MON DROIT – “God and my Right” (birthright of Israel). The Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (Royal Arms), the original Queen Victoria Realm (1837-1952) atop the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 63 & 64 Vict. Ch.12, Courts and Customs House etc.). (English Lion = Law & Scottish Unicorn = Conveyancing) The Seal on our Constitution therefore carries the Lion and Crown of Judah, the harp of David, the golden lion of Solomon, the red lion of Zerah, the Unicorn-Emblem of Joseph (Deuteronomy 33:16-17) and the “Coat of Many Colours (many Coats-of-Arms*)”, the promised blessing of enemies cursed, the birthright of Israel and the acknowledgement of God as the One who orchestrated it all. On the Coat-of-Arms, the belt surrounding the shield; with which the people were to gird up their loins with great strength; has written on it, “Honi soit qui mal y pense” is Old French and it is one of God’s rules concerning His advice and Divine-Justice and means “Evil be to him who thinks it”, the promised blessing of enemies cursed, the birthright of Israel and the acknowledgement of God as the One who orchestrated it all. The shield shows, in the top left-hand and bottom right-hand quarters, six lions “couchant” symbolizing England; Wales* and all the young lions of the British Commonwealth. *Wales also adopted the Harp of David as an emblem and their national musical-instrument. Another “Sign” of the British-Hebrew/Israelite ancestry and heritage is the fact that, as in Hebrew, Berit or Brit means “Covenant” in the Welsh language.

“When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.” ~Section 109 Inconsistency of laws – Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, 1900 (Imp.). ‘Thus Magna Charta, the Petition of Rights, and the Bill of Rights, contain declarations of (prerogative inherent) rights, privileges, and immunities, which are said to be the inalienable birthright and heritage of every British subject, protecting his liberty from unlawful impairment and his property from spoliation.’

‘RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, AND IMMUNITIES.—Contained in numerous charters, confirmations of charters, and Acts of Parliament assented to by the Crown from the earliest period of English history, including Magna Charta (1215) [ACT (1297) 25 Edw 1 c 29]; the Petition of Rights (1627), 3 Char. I. c. 1; the Habeas Corpus Act (1640), 16 Char. I. c. 10; the Bill of Rights (1688), 1 Wm. and Mary c. 2; and the Act of Settlement (1700), 12 and 13 Wm. III. c. 2 [Imp. (ACT)], sect. 4 The laws and statutes of the realm confirmed. The Bill of Rights is of special interest as declaring that certain recited rights are “the true ancient and indubitable rights and liberties of the people to be firmly and strictly holden and observed in all times to come.’ Authority: The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, ss. 18. “Constitution.” Part III; Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 (Legislation Act (2001) Former NSW and UK); Constitution Act 1902 (NSW), sect. 5 ‘subject to the provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act’; Victoria v Commonwealth (“Payroll Tax case”) [1971] HCA 16 at p397 “[5]…the Constitution is not an ordinary statute: it is a fundamental law.”]. Maxim: ‘The custom of the English people, and the common law is free.’ Consuetudo populi Anglicani et communis lex liberta, i.e. “Do not encroach against others or their property.”

The Magna Carta owned by the Australian nation

“I should like to say that the statement of Magna Carta … is the whole basis of the rule of law. It is because of the development of the rule of law that we today enjoy the benefits of a free democracy. Therefore, this remains one of the great documents of our history. It will be a source of great pride to us to feel that we have in this place one of the ancient copies of this document.” – The Rt Hon. Robert Gordon Menzies, Prime Minister of Australia, House of Representatives, 19 August 1952. Source: Parliament of Australia Collection; Quotes.

~:For the Federal Commonwealth of Australia with the affirmation of allegiance:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben-Anthony: of the house and family of Rushton, do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. [cf. the act of the British Parliament for the British subjects of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, 1900 (63 & 64 Vict. Ch.12 ) (Imp.) Schedule, Affirmation [Authority: Brown v. Belleville (City), 2013 ONCA 148: Held that “successors may enforce a contract.” cf. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW & Imp.), s.12 Compassing etc.]

I come in peace [cf. AR 27-161-1 Law of Peace] for giving prescribed notice of certified proof of life certificate and claim of constitutional exemption with the absolute prerogative inherent ‘rights, privileges, and immunities, the inalienable birthright and heritage of every British subject’ in accordance with the Constitution. [cf. Baker v The Queen [2004] HCA 45 at [140]; South Australia v The Commonwealth [1942] HCA 14; 65 CLR 373, p. 408; Form AUS061.1402]

I am a living man, in good faith, being the age of majority, with clean hands and natural-born subject to the Queen within the allegiance of the de jure Australian “Imperial Crown”, born into the [in]heritance of “the People” of “the Australian Imperial Crown” aka “the Imperial Crown” as “the beneficiary” of the Usufruct of “the People” and the Naked Owners of the Usufruct of “the Grantor” of the Usufruct my “Forefathers” of the original Colony of New South Wales (landed 1788) and I hereby execute and accept postliminy responsibilities and obligations in that [in]heritance as “the beneficiary” and “the Naked Owner” (First Right of Usufruct aka First Use of the Fruits) with a “beneficial interest” in the usufruct, federal subject united in one federal body of “the Trustee” of the Usufruct being “the People” in our “Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia” under “the Constitution” thereby established under the Australian Imperial Crown United Kingdom of Australia under the blessing of Almighty God and successor in the indissoluble Federal Commonwealth of Australia realm, at the King’s [GvR] seat of Government, in the General Post-Office exchange, established by the will of “the People” (Vox Populi, Vox Dei, the voice of “the People” is the voice of god) in accordance with the Preamble [Cl. 2, Sect. 117, 125] of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, 1900 (Imp.) “Testamentary Trust” deed under the blessing of Almighty God by “Will of God” and “Testament of Christ”, Proclaimed and Gazetted 1st January 1901 as indissoluble, trusting in the Imperial Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God, in accordance with the law of the original non-corporate Commonwealth [cf. P.G.P.A. (Cth) § 11(b)]. With the de jure [in]heritance Line of Authority, I hereby renounce any and all imposed, assumed or presumed title, status or contract as an ‘Australian Citizen’ or ‘Citizenship’ [cf. Australian Citizenship Act 2007; 8 U.S.C. § 1481(a)(2); Luke 15:14-15] and hereby revoke, rescind, and make null and void all de facto administration of “the Commonwealth of Australia” and powers of attorney ab initio under “the Crown” aka “the St Edwards Crown” defined as de facto “Administrator” under Rules of Usufruct (as per Australian Treaty 1910 No. 8, International Convention concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land (The Hague Convention (IV)); Article 55 ‘Administration under Rules of Usufruct’ ratified 26th January 1910) that is usurping de jure “the Australian Imperial Crown” aka “the Imperial Crown” under the ‘trustee~ship system of the United Nations’ [cf. Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth), p. 3 at [s. 5(1)] “trust territory”] as “the Usufructuary” of the Usufructis defined as “the Crown” aka “the St Edwards Crown” is obligated to International Laws of Armed Conflict, International Humanitarian Law, Charters of Human Rights and Civil & Political Rights, including but not limited to International Treaties, Pacts and Conventions and “the Crown” did usurp the “Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia” from “the Imperial Crown” forming the de facto “Australian Government” on the 18th December 1972 that is not the de jure “Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia” and with this prescribed entitlement order for accession by special depositary in formal equity, witness our hands and seals. Eph. 2:12; Psa. 33:12; Col. 1:13; Phi. 3:20; 1 Kings 18:21.

SSS.

This is pursuant to the Hague Conference on Private International Law dated October 5th, 1961, at the Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legislation for Foreign Public Documents, and this procedure is required for the legalisation of administrative, judicial and trust documents as herein referenced and enclosed.

• N.B. Without a referendum by the people the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 was passed and came into effect on the de facto Australia Day, 26 January 1949.
• The immigration minister (Calwell) was at pains to point out that (anyone born or naturalised in Australia was a British subject) Australians would remain British subjects while also becoming Australian citizens.
• The passage of the ‘Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth)’ following the ‘International Monetary Agreements (IMF) Act 1947 (Cth)’ required to meet Australia’s obligations to the IMF and World Bank, marked the first time the term ‘Australian citizen’ had been used in any legislation, including the Constitution. Meanwhile, the Liberal-Country Party coalition was outraged by the legislation, calling it ‘a sinister plot to liquidate the [British] Empire’. cf. National Museum of Australia ~ Citizenship Act.
• ‘A lawful oath is a part of religious worship (Deu 10:20); wherein upon just occasion, the person swearing solemnly calleth God to witness what he asserteth or promiseth; and to judge him according to the truth or falsehood of what he sweareth, (Exd 20:7; Lev 19:12; 2Co 1:23; 2Ch 6:22-23).’ Cf. Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) ~ Chap. XXII Of Lawful Oaths and Vows; An Act for Securing the Protestant Religion and Presbyterian Church Government [1707, c 6] (Imp.) [Accession Council and Principal Proclamation Oath];
• In Moller v Board of Examiners for Legal Practitioners [1999] VSC 55 at [17-18], found that ‘Australia is a constitutional monarchy’ and officers are required ‘swear an oath of allegiance’.
• ‘Persons entering on certain offices (l) are required by law to take the oath of allegiance… The taking of the statutory oath does not add to the natural duty of a British subject, who is in all cases bound as though he had taken the oath.’ Cf. Constitutional Law 487. (5.) The Oath of Allegiance, p342.
• ‘It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.’ Cf. The Paris Peace Treaty of September 30, 1783, Art. 4 – 5.

~:For the Bill of Rights.

Allegiance:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben-Anthony: von Rushton, doe sincerely promise and sweare that I will be faithfull and beare true Allegiance to their Majestyes King William and Queene Mary Soe helpe me God. Cf. Bill of Rights 1688, CHAPTER 2, 1 Will and Mar Sess 2. (ACT & Cth).

Supremacy:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben-Anthony: von Rushton, doe sweare that I doe from my Heart Abhorr, Detest and Abjure as Impious and Hereticall this damnable Doctrine and Position that Princes Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope or any Authority of the See of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever. And I doe declare that noe Forreigne Prince, Person, Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God. Cf. Bill of Rights 1688, CHAPTER 2, 1 Will and Mar Sess 2. (ACT & Cth).

Oath of Allegiance:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben Anthony: von Rushton, do affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heirs and Successors according to law. So help me God. Cf. Oaths Act 1900 (NSW), Schedule 2. Oath of Allegiance.

Affirmation:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben Anthony: von Rushton, do affirm that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Victoria in the office of Commonwealth Public Official. So help me God. Cf. Oaths Act 1900 (NSW) – Schedule 3. Official oath.

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben Anthony: von Rushton, do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law in the Crown office of Coroner. Cf. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 (Imp.) – Schedule. [Authority: Brown v. Belleville (City), 2013 ONCA 148: Held that “successors may enforce a contract.” cf. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW & Imp.), s.12 Compassing etc.]

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben Anthony: von Rushton, do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve in the office of Commonwealth Public Official. So help me God. Cf. Oaths and Affirmations Act 1984 (ACT), Shedule 1. Oath and affirmation of office. 

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben-Anthony: von Rushton, solemnly affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. Cf. Oaths and Affirmations Act 1984 (ACT), Schedule 1A.1.

We take this solemn oath/affirmation freely, in good faith, without coercion, reservation or ulterior motive, according to One’s conscience, and without any mental reservation, under the authority and jurisdiction of Almighty God and the Royal Law.

The Authority of the Official in the Office of the Accountable Authority for the non-corporate Commonwealth entity in accordance with the “Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth) § 11(b)”. The Occupant of the Office of Accountable Authority is also a “Commonwealth Public Official”. cf. Crimes Act 1914.

The following caretaker Commonwealth offices are now made and occupied:

1. Office of Commonwealth Public Official for The Commonwealth of Australia – a non‑corporate Commonwealth entity. Powers; Investigation, arrest and prosecution of offences of the laws of The Commonwealth. [Cf. In good faith, postliminium non-corporate Federal Commonwealth of Australia Government, “Commonwealth officer”, gazetted (2000) to an official post, Service Number (AGSN): 76 XXX X82, pursuant to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Div. 121.1(1)(a), (f-g) and Dictionary.]

On October 29, 1900, the office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia was constituted by letters patent, which included provision for a great seal for the Commonwealth.

Since the most remote periods princes, nobles, important personages, and traders had been in the habit of using their own personal seals in place of a signature, and when, in the course of time, the art of heraldry flourished, the seal bore the arms of the owner upon it, in as full detail as was possible. When knighthood was in flower, the idea of a knight without a coat of arms would have seemed as absurd as a handle without a pump. The title “Sir” was the handle, but the actual and visible record of his deeds, and of his family, was his coat-of-arms.

The Earl of Hopetoun, the first Governor General of the Commonwealth, was naturally in possession of a personal seal bearing his arms fully displayed. This seal was used for all official purposes from October 29, 1900, till July l8, 1902, from which latter date till January 21, 1904, Lord Tennyson’s personal seal was in use, he having succeeded Lord Hopetoun as Governor-General. I have not seen an impression of Lord Hopetoun’s seal, but I have one in red wax of Lord Tennyson’s, which is quite large and of an oval shape; it bears his arms as they are shown In Burke’s Peerage.

Round the hall at Government House, Sydney, are depicted in correct colouring the arms of all the State Governors, from Arthur Phillip to Sir Dudley de Chair.

An January 21, 1904, the first actual great seal of the Commonwealth came into use; this had been prepared in 1903, and had been granted by King Edward VII. King Edward died on May 6, 1910, but by a warrant of King George V., dated 20 days later, the use of King Edwards seal was authorised till a new one should be provided. This, the second great seal of the Commonwealth, arrived here in 1912, and bears upon it a design similar to that of its predecessor, with a few exceptions.

The Royal Arms and Imperial Crown in the centre are surrounded by six shields, having their base points Inwards. On these shields, treated as coats of arms, are the official badges of the six federated States. Round the edge of the seal runs an Inscription in Latin and English. When a new great seal shall be required for the Commonwealth, in addition to correcting the above mentioned errors, the arms of Canberra will have to be included. [Source: The Sydney Morning Herald, Saturday, October 1, 1932 ~ THE GREAT SEAL Of the Commonwealth by FLINDERS BARR.]

The Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Australia (H.M. King George V version) was “returned to the Royal Mint and destroyed. Copy of the certificate given by the Royal Mint to this effect dated 28th February 1945.” Cf. Memorandum for the Secretary, Prime Minister’s Department. 436/1/127 dated 9th April 1945, National Archives of Australia, file ref: NAA A462 828/3/4.

~:For the Private-Territory-Command-Post/Station: Federal General Post-office (Crown Department of State/Territory) for all His Majesty’s Dominions for the erection of one Head Office in each State/Territory:

Be it therefore enacted by His Excellency, “that there be established, at the King’s seat of Government of the Federal Capital Territory of the Commonwealth of Australia (1909) [born of the Commonwealth Constitution, 1900 (Imp.) – Sect. 111, 122, 125], by the General Post-office, under the direction of the Postmaster-General” for all his Majesty’s Dominions in the Commonwealth realms, for the laws of the original non-corporate Commonwealth [PGPA (Cth) § 11(b)]; Eph. 2:12, Psalm 33:12.

:CAPTURING OF THE ORIGINAL FEDERAL-TERRITORY OF THE-COMMONWEALTH LOCATION FOR BOTH THE POST-OFFICE AND ORIGINAL SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE STATE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. [Authority: The inherent ancient lore and customs of the post office, or more broadly, postal services, is specifically legislated in the Federal Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp.), with the de jure establishment of The Postmaster-General’s Department (P.M.G.) at Federation in 1901, in accordance with section 51. Legislative powers of the Parliament: (v). postal, telegraphic, telephonic, and other like services; and (vi). the naval and military defence of the Commonwealth and of the several States, and the control of the forces to execute and maintain the laws of the Commonwealth; The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, s.125 Seat of Government, sec. 52 (I.) all places acquired by the Commonwealth for public purposes, sec. 85 (I.) Transfer of Property of State to Commonwealth and s.8 Application of Colonial Boundaries Act; Mat. 6:24]

~0 FOR THIS PLENIPOTENTIARY-LORDSHIP-CLAIMANT: Ben-Anthony: Rushton’s-KNOWLEDGE FOR THE CLAIM OF THE LIVE-LIFE IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THIS CLAIMANT WITH THIS CASE-NUMBER: POSTAL-REGISTRATION-AP-ARTICLE-ID:~532623174016: FOR THE PROPER-SERVICE WITH THE C.C.~12-B~4. NOTE: FOR THE NOTICE OF THE RENUNCIATION OF THE CITIZENSHIP AND REVERSION IS WITH THE AUSTRALIAN-GOVERNMEMT-[DE]PARTMENT-OF-HOME-AFFAIRS: POSTAL-REGISTRATION-AP-ARTICLE-ID:~532623179011: FOR THE PROPER-SERVICE WITH THE C.C.~12-B~4. NOTE: FOR THE NOTICE OF THE CLAIM OF THE LIVE-LIFE IS WITH THE AUSTRALIAN-GOVERNMEMT-[DE]PARTMENT-OF-HUMAN-SERVICES: CLAIM-[RE]CEIPT-NUMBER:~0018727372: FOR THE PROPER-SERVICE WITH THE C.C.~12-B~4. NOTE: FOR THE NOTICE OF THE CLAIM OF THE LIVE-LIFE IS WITH HER-MAJESTY’S-PASSPORT-OFFICE: POSTAL-REGISTRATION-MAIL-NUMBER: RR~155182084:AU: FOR THE PROPER-SERVICE WITH THE C.C.~12-B~4.

~1 FOR THIS GLOBAL-POSTAL-PLOYMENT-SERVICE-TREATY OF THIS WITNESS, CLAIMANT, LIVE-LIFE-BIRTH-CLAIMANT, VISITOR, NEUTERAL &: POSTMASTER: Ben-Anthony: Rushton’s-KNOWLEDGE ARE WITH THESE PERFORMANCES OF THIS SALVAGE &: TOW WITH THIS CARGO: THE-COMMONWEALTH-OF-AUSTRALIA-FEDERAL-FLAG OF THIS C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-P.-FLAG-VESSEL WITH THIS BILL OF THIS LADING WITH THIS GLOBAL-POSTAL-TREATY &: MARKET-TRADE-PORT OF THESE JOINING-CONTRACT/TREATY-FLAGS WITH THIS DOCUMENT-VESSEL OF THIS DOCUMENT-STATE WITH THIS SAFE-PASSAGE &: SAFE-HARBOUR IN THIS NOW-SPACE WITH THIS DRY-DOCK-VESSEL AND FEDERAL-COMMONWEALTH-MISSION: AUSTRALIA-FEE-FREIGHT-, SILVER-TROY-OUNCE-TREATY BY THIS GLOBAL-POSTAL-PLOYMENT-SERVICE-TREATY.

~B Flag of the Correct-Sentence-Structure-Communications-Parse-Syntax-Grammar with the contracting-persons of a Contract-Postal-Corporation-Venue.(C.S.S.C.P.S.G. Quantum-Language Grammar-Flag: Title 4, Federal (G-Spec) for the united States of America and the Federal Flag of the Commonwealth of Australia: Gazetted (No. 8) in 1903 with the large six pointed Federation Star (below the Union Jack) on a red field with the dimensions of the official land flag. These six points represent the federation of the six colonies in 1901 with the 5-9 pointed stars in the fly representing the Southern Cross: Bible-Scripture-~2-Tim.-~3:16.-“You will keep us safe from ourselves.”~Robert Grey, U.N. Head of the Postal Administration.)

Private-Territory-Command-Post/Station:

~For the Federal Postmaster-General with the General Post-office House and Station near the indissoluble Federal Commonwealth-Territory’s, Crown Minister of State for His Majesty’s Dominions in the Commonwealth-Territory’s Affirmation:

I, His Lordship (Most Rev. Ex.) :Ben-Anthony: von Rushton, do solemnly and sincerely declare that I will well and truly serve His Majesty King George the Sixth, His heirs and successors according to law on the Office of the Federal-Postmaster-General (“granted, for us and our heirs for ever, in perpetuity”, “good and effectual in law against our heirs and successors,” for the honouring of our family estate’s forefathers faithful custom and usage, tradition and warranted duty “On His Majesty’s Service” from time immemorial records as bonded contract holder surities for the private station (Royal Mail) Crown Receiving, General Post-offices and Postmaster-ships by the letters patent grants).

[Cf. Ministers affirmations (1938), National Archives of Australia, A5447, 34, 18th Commonwealth Ministry; Masters of the Post, p.18; Cromwell’s Protectorate (1657) Act for the establishment of the ‘General Post-Office’ entitled “Postage of England, Scotland and Ireland Setled” (1657 c.30); ~Ab inito~ (1788 First Fleet-NSW Corps) NSW Government Gazzette 1873 ~General Post Office ~Contracts for conveyance of Post Office Mails; Commonwealth Gazette Sat 2 Sep 1905 [Issue No.45], Page 751-754, Postmaster-General’s Department ~NSW Conveyamce of Mails; Commonwealth Gazette Sat 16 Dec 1905 [Issue No.62], Page 980, Postmaster-General’s Department ~NSW Conveyamce of Mails Accepted Contracts-through-~now-time by AUSTIN CHAPMAN, Postmaster-General; Brown v. Belleville (City), 2013 ONCA 148: Held that “successors may enforce a contract.” cf. Crimes Act 1900 (NSW & Imp.), s.12 Compassing etc.]

“If the supposed dead Man prove to be alive, then the Title is revested. Action for mean Profits with Interest” and “the trustee is bound to execute them: he may defend his title in the name of the trustee.” [Cestui Que Vie Act (1666), C. 11 (Reginal. 18 and 19 Cha 2), Section IV (created of people who were slaughtered, enslaved, minors, incompetents, institutionalised, incarcerated, bankrupt, mort-gaged or private companies)]. Maxim: “What is LIKE is not the same; for NOTHING similar is the same.” 4 Coke, 18. Fiction yields to truth. [See Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Ed.] “If the lawful being (living man at peace) distinguishes himself as a party other than the legal fiction (civilly dead in law, assuming something not true is true), the two are separated.” Gen. 3:22. “On the fact that one of the chief characteristics of a fiction is the explicit consciousness of its fictitiousness.” [Cf. Dernburg, Pandekten, 6th ed. (Berlin, 1900), vol. 1, p. 84. The Nature of the Rights of the “Cestui Que Trust”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Apr., 1917), pp. 269-2904.]

“Although a testator may have mistaken the nomen, cognomen, or praenomen of a legatee, yet, if it be certain who is the person meant, the legacy is valid.” Inst. 2, 20, 29; Broom, Max. 645; 2 Domat b. 2, 1, s. 6, § 10, 19. si quidem in nomine, cognomine, przenomine legatarii testator erraverit, cum de persona constat, nihilominus valet legatum. “The cognomen is derived from the blood of ancestors and is intrinsic; an agnomen (or honorary title) arises from an event, and is extrinsic.” – intrinsecum est; agnomen extrinsecum ab eventu. Cf. 6 COKE, 65. STRATTON V. FOSTER, Legal Maxims Black’s 7th Ed.

“Indeed, no more than (affidavits) is necessary to make the prima facie case.” [UCC § 1-307. Prima Facie Evidence; UNITED STATES vs. KIS, 658 F.2nd, 526, 536 (7th Cir. 1981); Cert Denied, 50 U.S. L.W. 2169; S. Ct. March 22, 1982.] Affidavit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1); Mat. 5:34-37, Jam. 5:12 also Dickerson v. Wainwright, 626 F.2d 1184 (1980); “My word is my bond” Num. 30:2; “Since there was no one greater for him to swear by, he swore by himself.” Heb. 6:13, 1 Joh. 5:7-8, Deu. 31:26]